Symeon Salos tagged as an agent provocateur

Note from Joanna 12Dec2016:
     Wow! Symeon Salos (Milan synod) was showing agent provocateur symptoms back in 1999.
     This is a conversation about the fiasco at Blanco.  It is difficult to understand coming into the conversation at this point.  So I have "colored coded" the different commentators.

In a message dated 10/29/99 12:30:34 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
frsymeon@... writes:

 Fri Oct 29, 1999
Looney Gooney Mooney is tagged as an agent provocateur

In a message dated 10/29/99 12:30:34 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
frsymeon@... writes:

Hopefully, the Church will also re-teach us about where our treasures are buried (in Christ & His Church or in the false security of civil authority). And tell us how to proceed if anyone of us suspect any kind of abuse between Orthodox Christians.  Let us not hide sin but let us also not expose those who are allegedly sinners under Church Authority has judged them first.
-- frsymeon
     [Vova's reply]: Nonsense Father, the Church has never had that
responsibility, and even during the golden eras of Byzantium and, for that
matter, Holy Rus, violators ot the common weal and public trust were put to
death by Orthodox sovereigns in a most painful manner. Forgiveness in a
Christian sense does not mean condoning, or even forgoing punishment or not
excising the cancer from the body politic.
9.)But even if "these guys" are nutty as they come, and use to sacrifice children, naked in the moon light, it doesn't hurt to act like Christians towards them, does it?
-- Deacon John Whiteford
[Vova's reply]: (To 9. - Yes it does). Father Deacon John, if I thought for a minute
that you believed this nonsense, I would be concerned. Fortunately, I don't.
For a mailing list which tends to get out the e-mail equivalent of the stake
whenever Catholics appear or whenever the word "ecumenical" is mentioned, to
say nothing of the MP bogeyman, I find the outpouring of implied support and
misguided and misplaced Christian love for child abusers and pseudoclergy to
be downright baffling. If makes me wonder if there is not some hidden agenda
     I have also heard several clergy rise to the passionate defense of the
ordination of these persons. Sorry that you do not like my observations, but
whether it was Vladyka Hilarion - whom I personally respect tremendously --
or not, it was a mistake. Consecration of a bishop imparts the next link in
the apostolic succession. It does not impart perfection, and bishops have
been making mistakes for almost 2000 years.
     In Christ
Vova Hindrichs

10.)For anyone guilty we pray for their repentance: for anyone wrongly
accused we pray for their steadfastness. We always pray for fallen sinners,
and never rejoice at their downfall. 
--Mr. Joseph Miller
Regardless of our "political" position on this or any issue we must remember that the Love of Christ is our orienting experience by which we must approach all things.  
-- frsymeon
[Vova's reply]: Yes, but forgiveness does not stand in the way of punishment or
elimination of a cancer from the body.

11.) I received a call from a man (who I knew previously, and who is a
lawyer) in 1998 [...] and asked how to get in touch with the mother of the
boy in question. During the course of that conversation, he stated that he
was working for unnamed clients, who had unspecified grievances with the
monastery. He also said that the reason he wanted to get in touch with this
woman was that he wanted "to find out why she took her son out of that
monastery." This doesn't prove that the charges are false, but it does
raise the question of whether the charges were the result of a victim in
search of justice, or simply a lawyer in search of a victim (. . .).
-Deacon John Whiteford
I still wonder about this Fr. John. Because I have heard that the money to be obtained from the civil suite is the real booty in all of this and that there is a ROCOR priest in the background on the plaintiffs side expecting his parish to be a hidden beneficiary so to be able to construct their new temple! It is not my intent to spread rumors. I was told this by someone I trust; I will not stand behind his unknown source however.  The unfortunate and equally unedifying fact is that is "wrinkle" on the Blanco episode is as believable as this thread has been.
[Vova's reply]:   (speaking to Mooney sarcastically) I love it! (You say, and I paraphrase:) 'Let's not rumor-monger, unless we are priests and unless we can stir up some more excrement! And then cleverly deny it so that we can still hide behind the mantle of Christian love.'   What a pathetic response.  And then neatly dumping it into the lap of the synod. I do not know you,
Father, but in my previous profession we would call actions like this those
of agents provocateurs.  And I don't care who ordained you; I stand behind that comment.

May the Myrrh-streaming Icon of the Theotokos of New Sarov be the monk's saving grace! And May God help us all!
[Vova's reply]:  I agree with that last statement, but St. John warned us of false
prophets and manifestations. Perhaps the Church needs to open its eyes when
it comes to the plethora of myrrh-streaming icons in the hands of less than
'chestnyj' representatives of the church. . .
-- Vova

The least in our Lord's Service,
Father Hierodeacon Symeon

Syracuse, NY

Book Review: The Sword and the Shield

AThe Sword and the Shield
The Sword and the Shield: And the
Secret History of the KGB

by Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin
New York: Basic Books, 1999, 700 pages
Reviewed by Father John Bockman
(Fr. John Bockman, HOCNA, reposed 2000)

It has happened before, and it can happen again. Some venal Americans and Europeans will sell their souls and bodies to a foreign enemy at great risk to our political freedom. You and I and our descendants who do not know, who forget, or who ignore the lessons of history, are doomed to relive it.
This heavy 700-page volume is based on an "unprecedented, top-secret archive" which the FBI has termed "the most complete and extensive intelligence ever achieved from any source." It provides the reader with astounding details concerning the KGB's secret operations in the United States and Europe. It identifies hundreds of Soviet agents for the first time. As a result of this book, "no one who spied for the Soviet Union at any point between the Bolshevik Revolution and the 1980s can now be sure that his or her secrets are safe."

This is really an historical specialist's book, but it can give any literate person some valuable insight into how the Communists affected American society, especially in the 1930s, even while left-leaning American intellectuals were protesting that nothing subversive was taking place.

Orthodox readers will be especially interested in the chapter "The Penetration and Persecution of the Soviet Churches," pp. 486-507, and will find that the book greatly supports the biblical injunction: "Put not your trust in princes, in the sons of men, in whom there is no salvation."
In the early and mid-1930s American and West-European security systems were primitive, and America and the West generally were vulnerable to penetration by very capable Soviet agents. If this book is accepted as factual, which is almost surely to be the case, the KGB infiltrated every branch of the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration, precisely as many loyal conservative Americans fervently believed at the time. Over the years, as this book points out, the KGB encouraged and contributed to the assassination of many loyal uncorrupted American officials. It discredited J. Edgar Hoover as a homosexual; it successfully infiltrated not only Jimmy Carter's presidential campaign, but also the entourages of Pope John Paul II, Andrei Sakharov, and prominent dissidents worldwide; along with the FBI, it contributed to the smearing of Martin Luther King; it used Communist Sandinistas for terrorist attacks against U.S. targets; it successfully manned eavesdropping operations against Henry Kissinger; it intercepted major defense and technological secrets from Boeing, Brookhaven National Laboratory, IBM, Lockheed, Hughes, Sperry Rand, and other American companies (dust jacket). All the while American liberals insisted that "political right-wingers" were raising false specters.

The hero of this work is Vasili Nikitch Mitrokhin, an employee for almost thirty years in the KGB intelligence archive in Moscow, who assembled and reassembled KGB data over a period of twelve years beginning in July 1972. At that time, since the KGB offices in the Lubyanka in central Moscow had become seriously over-crowded, the First Chief (Foreign Intelligence) Directorate moved to a new building at Yasenevo, southeast of Moscow, beyond Moscow's Garden Ring. Mitrokhin was made solely responsible for checking and sealing the approximately 30,000 files in the archive before they were transported to the new headquarters. His routine was to spend Wednesdays at the Lubyanka inspecting the most secret files (of Directorate S), checking them, compiling inventories, and writing index cards. Once he personally reviewed them, batches of files were placed in sealed containers and transported from the Lubyanka to Yasenevo where he checked them again.

Mitrokhin spent increasingly more time working with the Directorate S files. These dealt with the so-called "illegals," KGB intelligence officers and agents, mostly of Soviet nationality, who worked under deep cover abroad as foreign citizens. They were named in contrast to "legals," who worked under diplomatic cover or in other official capacity in foreign capitals, but essentially pursued the same Communist goals.

Before World War I the "illegals" had been hugely successful worldwide.
They successfully achieved bogus identities as foreign nationals in a variety of professions, including Costa Rican ambassador, piano tuner, and Governor of New York State!
These "illegals" understood themselves and were depicted as self-sacrificing heroes in a great cause. It should be noted that contemporary Russia, though freed from the more deadly yoke of Communism, still celebrates them. Shortly after the death in 1995 of the best-known American illegal, Morris Cohen, President Yeltsin conferred on him the posthumous title of Hero of the Russian Federation (p.9).
Incredibly, in twelve years of service in the archives, Mitrokhin was never once searched. At great potential danger to himself he collected data from 1972 until his retirement in 1984, spent years sorting through his notes and assembling his data in a large volume with linking narrative, while he waited for the opportunity to make his information available to the world. Not until the break-up of the Soviet Union with attendant weakening of frontier controls at the borders of the new Russian Federation, was he able, in March 1992, to bring samples to the British embassy in the capital of one of the new independent Baltic republics.

There he told the British that the samples were only a part of a large personal archive which included material on KGB operations in Britain. He agreed to return a month later to meet representatives of the British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS). By September 1992 he was on his way to Britain in the company of the SIS, and in November he was able to move his family out of Russia to England. Now a British citizen, he has been spending several days a week working on his archive and responding to questions from intelligence services on five continents.

Mitrokhin reveals that the early and mid-1930s were an era of remarkable Soviet success in the establishment and implementation of a group called "the Great Illegals." This was composed of young, remarkably talented, ideological, and highly dedicated individuals, not only Russians, but a variety of multi-lingual Central Europeans who shared a visionary faith in the "Communist millennium." They went about successfully acquiring diplomatic ciphers and documents from agents motivated by money and sex rather than ideology. It is perhaps noteworthy that Soviet intelligence made use of the prestigious Tsarist Okhrana which had as a major priority the theft of foreign ciphers to assist in code breaking.
Documents from the 1930s relating to negotiations between British leaders and the highest leadership of Nazi Germany are still kept in secret archives of the British Foreign Office to conceal the British policy of collusion with Nazi Germany in the latter's eastern move against the Soviet Union (p. 55).
Among the inter-war heroes of Soviet foreign intelligence were the "Magnificent Five." This group of five young Cam-.bridge University students was recruited by Arnold Deutsch, an Austrian Jew, considered by many the most talented of the Great Illegals. The Five were Anthony Blunt, Guy Burgess, John Caincross, Donald MacLean, and Kim Philby. They supplied such a volume of high-grade intelligence from the British Foreign Office and intelligence community that the Soviets had a hard time keeping up with it. How each of these men was able to accomplish his huge contribution to Soviet intelligence is reported in great detail.

Most Americans are too young to have lived through the dangerous years of subversion by Soviet agents and their American and British "fellow travelers." Left-leaning politicians and academics have largely ignored facts in painting a rosy picture of our relations with the Soviet Union before and during World War II. As a result, the great genocides and enormous injustices perpetrated by the Communists against their own people and other nations have been glossed over compared with the demonization of Hitler and the Nazis. It would be good if younger Americans were made aware of the extent to which American and West European institutions had been successfully infiltrated by Communist agents over many years, and of the ways in which these infiltrations have contributed to the present breakdown of American culture.

This is a fascinating book. It forewarns of the constant danger that other men and women will be tempted to sell their souls and their country to a foreign power for ideological reasons, or simply for hard cash, as predatory forces arise to threaten us in the future. We are already witnessing how far this danger has progressed from the side of Chinese Communism.

Another review:

Book Review
The Sword and the Shield
by Christopher Andrew

Reviewed by Jim Bronskill
Southam Newspapers; Southam News
October 6, 1999

KGB clerics spied in Alberta
Russian spies in clerics' robes
At a Nisku parish, the priests worked for the KGB - book

Two missionary priests who served in Canadian parishes spied for the KGB in the early 1970s, says a new book on the Soviet intelligence agency.

The Russian Orthodox clerics used their religious cover to conduct secret research in Alberta and Saskatchewan for the KGB's foreign intelligence directorate, reveals historian Christopher Andrew in The Sword and the Shield.

The book claims Victor Petluchenko, known to the KGB as Patriot, and Ivan Borcha, code-named Fyodor, studied parish registers, gathering biographical material to help future spies establish convincing identities.

Andrew's book, which contains many revelations about the Soviet Union's Cold War spy operations,is based on files compiled by Col. Vasili Mitrokhin, a former KGB archivist who defected in 1992.

Records uncovered by Southam News show Petluchenko and John Borcha (the name John translates as Ivan in the Russian language) landed in Edmonton with their families in late June 1970.

Petluchenko was assigned to St. Mary's Russian Orthodox Church near Nisku, south of Edmonton, where he served until mid-1975, then returned overseas, according to Echoes of Faith, a history of the parish. Borcha occasionally undertook duties at St. Mary's.

Petluchenko also served at parishes in a number of other Alberta towns, including Calmar, Spirit River and Thorsby.

"Father Victor started Saturday school with the children, held Christmas concerts at the church hall and went caroling with the young people at Christmastime," says the St. Mary's parish history. "He was loved by all."

According to The Sword and the Shield, Petluchenko served two masters -- the church and the KGB's Directorate S.

Andrew's book says Petluchenko collected information in Alberta for use in devising the well-documented legends, or background stories, of KGB illegals.  Borcha studied registers in Alberta and Saskatchewan.

The Orthodox Church's modern-era co-operation with Soviet intelligence began in the early 1940s when the Moscow Patriarchate, the church's administrative centre, was re-established following decades of religious persecution, says Andrew, a history professor at Britain's Cambridge University.

The KGB used agents among Russian Orthodox clergy in the West to not only carry out research, but to spy on emigre communities and to identify possible intelligence recruits. The estimated 15 to 20 per cent of Orthodox priests who refused were denied advancement within the church.

However, it would be "simplistic and unjust" to see all the KGB agents and co-optees in the Orthodox Church as simply having no real religious faith, writes Andrew.

"Most Russian Orthodox priests probably believed they had no option but to accept some of the demands of state security."

In addition, many may have been influenced by the long tradition of Orthodox spirituality, dating to czarist days, that emphasized submission to both God and state ruler.

The book also reveals a Canadian link to KGB operations in Poland designed to undermine Pope John Paul II, former archbishop of Krakow and staunch anti-Communist.